Is Huber Letter a Fraud?
The controversy surrounding Dr. Huber's letter to the USDA, calling for a ban on glyphosate applications and a rescinding of the approval of Monsanto's GE alfala, is heating up. There are now claims circulating on the internet that the good Professor's letter is a fraud.
The source of this claim is unknown but the fuel was provided by one of Dr. Huber's former colleagues at Purdue University, Dr. Peter Goldsbrough. Professor Goldsbrough claims he does not know of any other scientists that have reported finding the alleged new micro-organism mentioned in Dr. Huber's letter. Efforts to contact Dr. Huber have failed and the authenticity of the letter has not been confirmed or rejected.
What is being lost in this current frenzy is that the only thing being challenged is the issue of the newly discovered and unnamed micro-organism. No one is challenging any of the other claims made in the letter including reference to scientific studies demonstrating that glyphosate applications have cumulative negative impacts on soil ecology and increased incidents of plant pathology.
I have carefully read the peer-reviewed scientific papers that Dr. Huber has published on glyphosate herbicide treatments. These papers confirm all of the allegations made in the letter except for the issue of the new micro-organism allegedly implicated in spontaneous abortions among mammalian species.
The peer-reviewed scientific papers confirm that sustained application of Roundup and other glyphosate herbicides is harmful to soil biota and to plants. No one is contesting these results.
Obviously, defenders of the herbicide protocol machine will claim that is precisely the point - to kill the weeds. But studies demonstrate that herbicides harm wild and beneficial companion plants and not just 'weeds,' and may also harm cultivars by making transgenic crops more susceptible to a wide range of micro-pathogens. This has nothing to do with the killing effectiveness of herbicides against weeds, the growing resistance of the common Lambs quarters notwithstanding. This has to do with the much more serious problem of the massive disturbance of complex soil biota relationships and resulting poorer crop health related to the cumulative effects of reduced biodiversity characteristic of herbicide-dependent agroecosystems.
The results still provide a solid scientific basis for a total ban on future use of glyphosate herbicides and a rescinding of the USDA's approval of the Roundup Ready alfalfa developed by Monsanto. The issue of the new organisms is irrelevant. Herbicide applications over the years damage soil ecology and increase plant diseases. This is not an allegation but a proven scientific fact.
We will keep monitoring the issue until it is resolved one way or the other. If Huber's letter is a fake, we will stand by our call for a ban based on all of the other proven and peer-reviewed scientific evidence that indicates glyphosate is dangerous to soil and plant health.
For one of the peer reviewed scientific papers prepared by Dr, Huber, please follow the link below. Again, this paper verifies many of the claims made in the letter with the exception of the issues surrounding the alleged discovery of a new unnamed micro-organism.
Go to: Dr. Huber's paper, "Ag Chemical and Crop Nutrient Interactions: Current Update."
0 comments:
Post a Comment